Skip to content
When a homeowner suffers a sudden water loss, they trust their insurance company to handle their claim fairly and help them restore their home. Unfortunately, this is not always the case.
Our client did everything right when she discovered water damage inside her wall.
How It Started: The Water Loss & Initial Response
- She called a trusted water restoration company to begin the dry-out process immediately.
- She reported the claim to her insurance company in a timely manner.
But instead of assisting her, her insurance company made things worse by:
- Forcing her to use their “preferred vendor” instead of her own trusted professionals.
- Telling her to remove the drying equipment—even though the home was still wet.
- Setting her up for further damage and mold growth by delaying necessary repairs.
Coercion & Intimidation from the Preferred Vendor
Once the insurance company’s preferred vendor contacted her, the situation spiraled into a nightmare.
- The vendor refused to explain the contract but insisted she sign immediately.
- They threatened her, saying:
“Sign the contract now, or we won’t show up.”
- She reluctantly signed—but they never showed up to dry out the home.
An Unsettling Visit from a Mysterious Mold Assessor
A few days later, our client heard a knock on her door.
- A woman stood outside, claiming to be a mold assessor.
- She refused to say who sent her or what company she worked for.
- After pressing her for answers, the assessor finally admitted she was from the insurance company—but only after our client refused to let a complete stranger into her home.
Weeks of Neglect & Manipulation
Despite the preferred vendor failing to show up for the dry-out, they returned EIGHT WEEKS later—long after the water loss—only to make more outrageous demands.
At this point, the house was still wet, mold had begun forming, and yet:
- The vendor demanded she sign a rebuild contract immediately, or they would leave again.
- They insisted they would handle the mold remediation—even though their own negligence caused the mold in the first place.
- Feeling trapped due to the “Right to Repair” clause in her policy, she reluctantly signed.
But the worst was yet to come.
Threats, Lies & Aggressive Behavior
Once the vendor finally arrived at her home to begin mold remediation:
- They informed her she would personally be responsible for a $12,000 mold remediation bill.
- They refused to take responsibility for breaking her granite countertops while removing cabinets.
- They yelled at her so aggressively that a neighbor came over to check on her well-being.
At this point, our client had enough. She was being manipulated, threatened, and pressured by her own insurance company’s handpicked vendor—a vendor that had already failed to show up twice.
When She Called Us, We Took Immediate Action
After hearing how terrified she was by the way she had been treated, we stepped in and fought back:
- Requested multiple reinspections to expose the full extent of the damage.
- Told the insurance desk adjuster that our client would NOT work with vendors who:
- Failed to show up when promised.
- Intimidated and threatened her.
- Underbid the job, putting her home at further risk.
- Challenged the absurdly low $11,582.46 repair estimate, which wouldn’t even cover:
- Bathroom rebuild
- Custom wall paints
- Flooring replacement
- Pack-out services
- Kitchen cabinets
The Final Victory: A 607.99% Claim Increase
After relentless back-and-forth negotiations, we achieved a major win for our client:
- Secured a final settlement of $82,000 in NEW money (a 607.99% increase from the original offer).
- Got her out of the predatory “Preferred Vendor” program so she could hire a trustworthy contractor.
- Ensured she had complete control over her home repairs, rather than being forced to use the insurance company’s cheapest option.
Why This Case Matters
This was not just about securing a higher payout—it was about standing up against a broken system that too often takes advantage of homeowners.
- Insurance companies should be there to HELP their policyholders, not intimidate them into bad contracts.
- Preferred vendor programs often prioritize cost-cutting over quality repairs, leaving homeowners trapped in a cycle of poor service and financial stress.
- If a policyholder is bullied, pressured, or misled, they need an advocate who will FIGHT for them.
This victory ensures our client can now rebuild her home the RIGHT way—with a contractor she trusts, not one handpicked by the insurance company to save money at her expense.
